- Charter of Transdisciplinarity

          ɡ

 

Special Issues

   - The Book Shop

The Golden Register -

 

Useful Sites

F.A.Q.

Index

 

 Maaberuna

english arabic

 

Spooky action at a distance

Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor


One of the most famous felines of the 20th century is slowly opening the door to discoveries that could revolutionize communications, and computersand spawn ever more rigorous tests of the very foundations of physics itself.

The cat is the potentially tragic hero(ine) in a quantum-physics paradox penned by Austrian physicist Erwin Schödinger in 1935. The cat finds itself enclosed in a box with an atom. When the atom decays, the cat will die.

In quantum physics, the cat and atom exist in both statesalive and dead, decayed and undecayeduntil someone opens the box and checks. Regardless of what the observer sees inside the box, the states of the cat and the atom are inextricably interlinked.

Among the notions Schrödinger tried to illumine with his paradox is a property he dubbed entanglement. In effect, the state of the cat knows the state of the atom - even at a distance. Thus, if an experimenter measures the state of one, he or she will know the state of the other without making the additional measurementthe relationship between their two states remains constant.

Entanglement forms the basis for key elements in the burgeoning field of quantum computing and communication. Whether quantum computers will ever be built remains an open question, some researchers say. But if such computers are built, achieving and maintaining entanglement will be critical for everything from processing data to transmitting it.

Hence the excitement over a report this week that physicists in Denmark have entangled two large clusters of atoms in neighboring containers. The feat, the team says, represents the first demonstration of entanglement between separated, large clusters of atoms, at room temperature, and for relatively long periods of time.

The Danish teams effort is not the first time scientists have entangled atoms, notes Eugene Polzik, who led the team at the University of Aahrus in Aarhus, Denmark.

Last year, for example, researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colo., reported that they had achieved entanglement with four atoms. The entangled atoms in the NIST experiment established their relationships through close-up interactions.

Milestone for quantum computing.

That was a milestone for quantum computing, says Dr Polzik. But its not so good for quantum communications, where you need to have entangled particles miles apart.

His team advanced that prospect by using a laser to entangle atoms in two containers a few millimeters apart. His team gathered cesium atoms and confined them in a pair of glass containers. Each held a trillion atoms.

The researchers treated each sample with a laser to give each clusters overall magnetic spin its own orientation. Then the team sent a single laser beam through the samples to entangle the disparate clouds. A similar laser shot half a millisecond later showed that while the orientation of each clouds spin had shifted somewhat, the original relationship between the two clouds orientations remained the same.

This is a real step forward, says William Wootters, a physicist at Williams College in Williams, Mass., who studies quantum interactions and did not take part in the experiment.

The teams use of a laser to entangle the disconnected clouds of atoms holds the promise for longer-distance quantum communication, which requires a set of entangled particles at each end of the quantum connection.

Like kids at an egg-toss contest, the team plans to continue to widen the gap between samples to see how far they can separate the clouds and still trigger entanglement.

Entanglement has an embattled history in physics, Dr Wootters says.

Back when Herr Schrödinger was writing about stuffing cats and atoms into boxes, he also held that entanglement was the one feature of quantum theory that distinguished it from classical physics, in which cause and effect could be distinguished and one object is forbidden from influencing another object at a distance instantaneously.

By contrast, according to quantum mechanics, an experimenter could entangle a pair of particles, separate them by vast distances, then instantaneously change the state of one by changing the state of the othereven at distances of millions of light years.

This spooky action at a distance, according to Albert Einstein and two colleagues, was a direct result of quantum mechanics if it failed to have more-classical underpinnings. It so defied common sense that they refused to accept quantum mechanics as a complete explanation for how physics really worked at the level of the very small.

The debate remained in the realm of thought experiments until 1964, when Irish physicist John Bell, working at the European Center for High Energy Physics in Geneva, described a way to test the idea.

Moreover, he concluded that if one followed the details of Einsteins argument to their logical conclusion, quantum mechanics was more than incomplete, it was wrong. This triggered an initial wave of experiments that demonstrated entanglement in the 1970s and 80s.

In 1997, a team at the University of Geneva conducted a particularly dramatic demonstration by entangling packets of light called photons, then sending them in opposite directions down fiber-optic lines to detectors nearly seven miles away.

When they measured properties of one photon, it had an instantaneous effect on the other. If the interaction behaved in a classical way, a measurable amount of time would have passed between measurement of one and the effect on the other.

Polziks team is riding what Dr Wootters calls a new wave of entanglement experiments, which has emerged only in the mid-1990s and is driven by the quest to design and build quantum computers.

Cal Tech physicist Richard Feynman is credited with being the first to propose the use of quantum computing, particularly for studying quantum phenomena.

Speed, and more speed

But the idea got its biggest boost in 1993, researchers say, when Peter Shor at AT&T Laboratories in Florham Park, N.J., showed that a quantum computer could solve several types of problems much faster than they could be solved on a conventional computer.

Such problems range from factoring large prime numbers, the key to breaking data-encryption codes, to the traveling salesman problem, which tries to find the most efficient path for people to take if they need to visit several customers in a given amount of time.

Quantum computers, Wootters notes, require large assemblages of entangled particles to achieve the data-crunching power required to solve these problems. Entanglement also holds the key to quantum communication and quantum teleportationways of transferring quantum information within and among quantum computers.

The possibility of quantum teleportation was first posited in 1993 by IBM researcher Charles Bennett and colleagues.

Teleportation is a really unfortunate term, says University of Michigan physicist Christopher Monroe. It implies moving people from point A to point B, when in fact it refers to creating a quantum state in one place that used to exist somewhere else with no intervening connection.

In order to instantly teleport those states, he continues, the sender and receiver must share entangled resources, such as Polziks atomic clouds.

In what Dr Monroe calls the most notable teleportation experiment yet, three years ago a team of researchers at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena used quantum teleportation to transfer photons over a three-foot distance.

Unlike other experiments that destroyed the transported photons as part of the process that confirmed their arrival, the Cal Tech group devised a system to verify the photons arrival without destroying them.

The next step, Monroe continues, will be to teleport states of atoms or other particles of mattera feat he estimates is still 20 years away.

*** *** ***

 

Front Page

 

Editorial

Spiritual Traditions

 

Mythology

 

Perennial Ethics

 

Spotlights

 

Epistemology

 

Alternative Medicine

 

Deep Ecology

Depth Psychology

Nonviolence & Resistance

 

Literature

 

Books & Readings

 

Art

 

On the Lookout

The Sycamore Center

 

: 3312257 - 11 - 963

: . .: 5866 - /

maaber@scs-net.org  :

  :        ӡ ߡ ɡ